The purpose of this presentation is to press The BC Green Party to deal with the issue of Independent Power Producers in a manner satisfactory to environmentalists. My sole concern is that BC has a viable Green Party option for next May’s election. I have never met Dr. Weaver.
Independent Power Producers (IPP´s), created by Gordon Campbell in 2002, were to produce power with unobtrusive little power schemes (daintily referred to as “run of river”). In fact, they were, from the outset, environmental catastrophes and by reason of sweetheart deals with political pals, have, just as predicted, have all but bankrupted BC Hydro.
Dr. David Suzuki, an eminent environmentalist, has recently classified Hydro power as not “clean and green” as alleged by Dr. Andrew Weaver, now Leader of the BC Green Party, when he endorsed Campbell’s 1992 Energy Policy scheme and supported this Liberal policy during the 2009 and 2013 elections.
My every instinct wants to support the Green Party but its endorsement of this policy makes it clearly impossible for any environmentalist to do so.
Dr. Weaver starts his patronizing response with:
“I am sorry Rafe but it appears to me you don’t understand the difference between small scale hydro and large scale hydro. A water wheel is small scale hydro; Site C dam is large scale hydro.”
A curious complaint since the reality is that Dr. Weaver may have thought IPPs were merely “water wheels” but that’s not what they were from the outset and we who were concerned took the time and made the effort to see for ourselves that they were full fledged power projects and campaigned flat out against them from the start
Clearly Dr. Weaver did not do this.
Dr Weaver’s letter to me, in full, follows this.
July 27, 2016
Dear Dr. Weaver,
Are you under the mistaken notion that your doctorate conferred the status of deity on you?
Your patronizing crack about “water wheels” was quite uncalled for, unbecoming and ironic since it was clearly you and the other suckers, who believed Campbell’s propaganda, who were taken in.
Let’s look at the record. You approved the Campbell Energy Policy of 2002 and, if you looked, could see with your own eyes what the consequences would be.
The right to make new power, except Site C, went to the private sector without rules or guidelines. That didn’t stop Campbell and finance minister Hansen spinning a yarn about little “mom and pop” operations (like General Electric) with no interference to the river flow with unobtrusive weirs replacing dams. My first reaction was to trust the premier. Then someone asked me, “Rafe, do you know what the hell you’re talking about?”
I sought advice from economists, environmentalists, and scientists and toured the Ashlu River first in 2007, shortly after becoming Official Spokesman for the Save Our Rivers Society, a paid position.
Dr. Weaver, If you tell me that you approved of this “rivers policy” after actually seeing the Ashlu River then you should be committed.
Have you seen it yet? Or any of the rivers destroyed by this policy that you, Leader of the Green Party, so enthusiastically endorse?
Unlike you, I have five years of government experience. In Cabinet, I watched and took my part in running BC Hydro, and quickly learned that it consistently and deliberately overestimates its needs and always has. Moreover, it has a mindset against alternate energy sources only seeing hydro thus, like the carpenter whose only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
It was clear to our government in 1980 that there would be no need for additional power for about 25 years, confirmed by the then independent BC Utilities Commission, a figure that has consistently been pushed forward and today is about 20 years.
Yet Hydro policy, supported by you and the Green Party, destroys our rivers, their ecologies, is bankrupting our public power company, while further enriching Liberal pals TO MAKE POWER BC HAS NEVER NEEDED AND WON’T LIKELY EVER NEED!
As a matter of interest Dr. Weaver, have you any idea of how much these IPP´s donate to the BC Liberal Party each year?
You now complain that the government didn’t enforce the environmental rules, yet I and my associates complained bitterly about that from the beginning – where were you? Show us a Hansard and all the outraged objections you raised, not during the Jessop Show last December 17*, but at the time.
The flimsy reason given for the destructive river policy is that otherwise, it we ran short, we’d have the Burrard Thermal Plant using fossil fuels; this even though no power needs are forecast for 20+ years, demand is falling, Site C is being built, and alternate sources are becoming more and more practical. (It’s more than a bit ironic that the Liberal government, slavering to extract, export and burn LNG, coal and gas, goes into a great flap at the thought of the occasional use of Burrard Thermal.)
Now you have the cheek to use pictures of environmental disgraces you did nothing to stop to prove YOU were right!
That tells me either you went to the Ashlu before you began ear-lobe nibbling with Campbell and decided it was in your political interest to keep your mouth shut OR you didn’t want to know the truth and couldn’t be bothered to go all the way to the Ashlu from Victoria to see for yourself. Instead you waited until last December to complain to Ian Jessop in a general interview!
Any reasonable person would conclude that you knew or ought to have known what Campbell’s river policy was going to do environmentally, long before you signed on to it.
Moreover, if I knew and could tell people, by 2008, what the sweetheart deal between Hydro and the IPP would do to Hydro finances, you must have known. Any half-decent opposition leader would have known these things.
And therein lies your problem, Dr. Weaver. You’ve let other considerations blind you to your duty as an Opposition Member of the Legislature to always fully test government policy,
As Lord Randolph Churchill said in the 1880s, “The duty of the Opposition is to oppose.”
Give it a try some time, no one else is these days and you never know what you’ll learn – as by visiting the Ashlu River when I did.
It is my understanding that when you’re criticized you sue, something I always found inappropriate. (I couldn’t stop being sued of course!) I felt that as Harry S Truman said, “if you can’t stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen”.
LETTER FROM DR. ANDREW WEAVER TO RAFE MAIR
On Jul 16, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Andrew Weaver <andrew.weaver AT greenparty.bc.ca> wrote:
I am sorry Rafe but it appears to me you don’t understand the difference between small scale hydro and large scale hydro. A water wheel is small scale hydro; Site C dam is large scale hydro. David’s article is referring to large scale hydro. He and I agree on the folly of Site C.
With respect to small scale hydro, you don’t know what my views are as we have never spoken about it and your only reference is one snippet from a long interview on a now departed Radio hosts show. You misrepresented my views in that. I would have expected better from someone like you.
I quite clearly stated that small scale hydro can provide some of the most environmentally friendly means of generating electricity if it is done in a properly regulatory environment. The problem with the BC Liberal approach to small scale hydro is the same as the problem with their approach to mining and forestry as well. They believe fundamentally in the professional reliance model and that government should stay out of the way and only apply tokenism in the area of compliance and enforcement. I, and the BC Greens believe that the role of government is to protect public resources. It is our duty to provide the regulatory environment and compliance/enforcement capacity to ensure that strict standards are maintained.
The BC NDP approach is no better than the BC Liberal approach. Their 353-word Power BC plan reads like a bad short answer response to a first year undergraduate course on energy policy. In fact, when I read it I was immediately reminded of the Monty Python Blue Peter parody (How to do it):
Your approach seems to be to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Our approach is to be far more cautious. We have a grand challenge ahead of us – the rapid decarbonization of our energy systems if we as a society want to make it out of the 21st century. That means no new investment in major fossil fuel infrastructure and widespread introduction of clean energy generation, storage and transportation systems. But in my view it’s critical that government provide a strong regulatory environment for the introduction of the latter.
The BC Green party have a shared vision of a prosperous province ground in a 21st century economy that is fiscally, environmentally and socially sustainable. It is a vision that puts the interests of people ahead of the interests of big corporations and big unions.
With best wishes,
*Archives, CFAX 1070, December 17, 2015, 1:30pm