AbeBooks.com. Thousands of booksellers - millions of books.
Feed on
Posts
Comments

HST and recall

As Bill Vander Zalm, Chris Delaney and Bill Tieleman push their Recall Agenda I hope they’re getting advice as they go.

At this point they have everything going for them including, critically, the people. But that can quickly change

Bill Vander Zalm is not noted for reflection before acting nor for taking any advice he doesn’t want to hear. This is his style and he can’t change that. It makes me think of Churchill, well into his 80s was advised by his doctor to quit drinking he replied “I should think it pretty hazardous to interfere with the ineradicable habit of a lifetime.”

Much about Vander Zalm’s approach to life is admirable indeed. He has maintained a sunny disposition through some pretty stressful times and has shown forgiveness to those, including me, who made his life miserable when he was premier. Continue Reading »

In the name of God, what’s the matter with us?

Are we really going to approve, if only by our silence,  the right of the police to try, convict and sentence citizens without the nuisance of allowing a person to have their case independently tried by an impartial judge?

In a classic case of Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462 Lord Sankey said this

“No matter what the charge or where the trial, the principle that the prosecution must prove the guilt of the prisoner is part of the common law of England and no attempt to whittle it down can be entertained”. Continue Reading »

I have become, in my antiquarian existence, a great fan of the iPod though I know  absolutely nothing about them, I have, however, collected 7372 musical pieces in my “library” of all genres.

Last week I discovered that I had a problem with one of the five iPods I possess so, knowing it was not on warranty thus I could expect no help from Apple, I took it to my local Future Shop. The problem was simple – I couldn’t turn it on. I charged it overnight – nothing.

The young man in the iPods section simply said “your battery is dead.”

“Then, could you sell me a battery and tell me how to install it?”

“Afraid not, sir, as you can see there’s no way to get into the machine.”

“&%$*#” I replied. Continue Reading »

It may not, if Premier Campbell can’t learn from previous political meltdowns.

So, Gordon (Pinocchio) Campbell is at 12 per cent “popularity.” I’d like to know who the hell the 12 per cent are! They must have just been aroused after a lengthy coma.

In my lifetime I have witnessed four political meltdowns, four parties that had the wheels fall off. They were:

The Bennett crash: In the 1972 election, an unbeatable Premier W.A.C. Bennett was indeed beaten when his party came apart during the election, the highlight coming when Phlyin’ Phil Gaglardi (so called because as highways minister he kept getting speeding tickets when “testing the curves”) offered to take over from Bennett. Neither the voters nor Bennett were comfortable with that offer.

The Zalm slam: In 1988 Premier Bill Vander Zalm (yep, same guy) faced a leadership secret vote at the Socred party convention in Penticton and was saved by Don Philips and Phil Gaglardi who put forward a motion to have the secret ballot be an open one, with the vote on that motion being open! The day was saved but unfortunately for Bill, there was a tomorrow, then a lot of tomorrows and it just got worse. At that, it was really Vander Zalm’s successor, Rita Johnston, who could have saved the party but put herself first.

The Kim Campbell gamble: In 1993, Brian Mulroney quit and turned the reins of office over to the luckless Kim Campbell, who tried to pull a party together that had been all but smashed to bits by her predecessor.

The New Dem sinking: In 2001, an NDP led by Ujjal Dosanjh and reeling from a premier Glen Clark scandal, plus a terrible decision to build ferries that weren’t appropriate for our waters now, was all but wiped out in the general election.

These situations had one thing in common — once the political vehicle began to wobble badly, nothing could save it, not even a leadership change as the federal Tories and provincial NDP made.

The factions factor

There’s a reason for this and it goes to the nature of a political party under our system. Unconditional loyalty only goes to a leader when things are going reasonably well. That loyalty is not a “for better or for worse” situation at all. All parties have factions and not all factions wanted the leader in the first place and have a death wish for him, believing that their guy/gal could have done better. They bury their feelings when things are going along OK but they return just when the leader needs loyalty most.

This goes deeper than just the party at large. Once the cracks show, usually with an angry MLA/MP crossing the floor, other well-known members of the party speak out. Constituency organizations turn on MLAs who won’t denounce the leader and snapping wannabes (who probably lost the nomination last time) lurk, awaiting the right moment to bite.

The leader tries to administer discipline, which just makes matters worse. Perhaps he tries to bring in legislation and policy that will appease the caucus, which is now a caucus that smells blood and won’t do what is expected of it any more. Grumbling turns into serious rumbling. One might call it the Tiger Woods syndrome, where no matter how hard you try, your efforts fall short.

Hard to forget

On the CBC political panel I share with Moe Sihota and Erin Chutter, the latest polls was the only topic and Moe suggested that Campbell still has two years to get things right. I suspect that answer was more a warning to the party he’s president of than a statement of belief. He suggested that Campbell might come up with a popular move, such as, he suggested, making mortgage payments tax deductible. Apart from the fact that since only the provincial share of income tax would be involved, thus a fairly modest amount, it’s easily handled by the NDP saying “we’ll do the same.”

It has been truly said — the putative authors are many — “In politics, six weeks is an eternity.” The problem the Liberals have is that not only must they come up with policies that appeal, but ones that block out the bad things that have happened. For that to happen, those bad things have to be buried in the past. Unfortunately for the Liberals, those bad things reappear anytime a voter buys something and pays the HST. It’s not just the hated tax, it’s the history of that tax. The HST not only reminds voters that they don’t like the tax but that the government lied to them.

Without intending cynicism, politicians are always “economical with the truth.” And the public expects that. They understand that politicians polish the apple, hire expensive spin doctors and only put out bad news on Friday afternoon when the media is in its pre-weekend tippling mode. What voters will not put up with is policy that was snuck by them and based on flat out prevarication. The leaking of the ministry policy paper that Finance Minister Colin Hansen saw two months before the election statement that HST wasn’t even on the radar, has created an open political sore that no ointment can cure.

But there’s more. This blatant untruth, of which voters are constantly reminded, also reminds them about other government, which is to say Gordon Campbell, deceits about the privatization of BC Rail, the size of the budget deficit, the fish farm issue and impacts of his energy policy. These would not be ongoing issues but are secured to the next campaign because of the premier’s utter lack of credibility of which these past events are resuscitated.

Then there is the Basi-Virk trial, which promises to have lots of ongoing reminders of government, ahem, shortcomings.

Prescription for survival

What should the Liberals do?

Just what Bennett Sr., Bill Vander Zalm, Brian Mulroney and the 1991 NDP failed to do — put the party first and fight not to win an election (though God knows what can happen in B.C. politics) but to have a viable party available to be a strong opposition and government-in-waiting.

One cannot leave this subject without speculating whether a new party might come out of the political fog. The opportunity is certainly there — there is a political collapse happening and politics, no less than nature, abhors a vacuum.

At this writing, however, it doesn’t seem to be happening. We hear rumbles from the Conservative party, which doesn’t seem to understand that the vacuum is not at the right but in the centre. Those who run this tiny gaggle of failed politicos and wannabes seem oblivious to the fact that any party connected by even an invisible thread to Stephen Harper & Co. is a bad political joke in these parts.

My way out long shot?

John Cummins and Vicki Huntington start a party clearly of the centre, thus resurrecting the late but now much lamented B.C. Social Credit party.

The visit of Pope Benedict XVI to the UK has tongues wagging, even royal tongues. Introspective parsons and religious writers are groping amongst the words uttered by His Holiness to guess what he is up to. That, however should be clear – he wants the prodigal Church of England community to return to the Papal fold. Other Popes have displayed a similar ambition.

Well, folks, as a quasi-lapsed Anglican I can tell you it ain’t going to happen unless Rome comes up with a sort of special status for the Anglican community. Sort of like China and Hong Kong perhaps. The basic reason is one of catechism.

The Anglican “faith” is very flexible. Numerous Anglican priests and higher have, for example, denied the “virgin birth” without expulsion following. I have told my priest that I can’t say the creed any more but I’ve been urged to stay on, not to be corrected but so that I could still make my peace with God. In fact I have a faith of my own which runs something like this – I acknowledge that an all powerful God could do all the things the Creed talks about and makes necessary for membership in the Church permissible but I don’t believe in them either. I say that they are immaterial and that when Jesus said Thou shalt love the Lord, etc, and love thy neighbour as thyself he also said “upon these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” That last sentence must mean something. Since he said it to an obnoxious lawyer (or is that redundant?) in answer to a question about what the law is I say that it meant simply “follow these two rules and you’ll be OK. The Creed and all the liturgy in which it’s encased is what turns Christianity from a simple message to one that requires armies of priests, splitting theological hairs with reckless abandon. Continue Reading »

I read a column the other day that dragged up an inner distress that I’ve tried to subvert. The theme of the article was that we kill our fish cruelly – by suffocation.

“Animal Rights” has been an ever growing issue for many years now and I suppose some progress has been made. There are laws; there is the SPCA and there are organizations that deal with individual issues like bull fighting. Paul Watson, the bravest man I’ve ever known, fights to save whales. My friend Anthony Marr, founder and major player in Heal Our Planet Earth (HOPE), fights for the entire animal kingdom every day of every year. Yet, somehow fish are nowhere to be seen.

Perhaps it’s all got something to do with Jesus, who not only didn’t rail against fishing but helped disciples to catch them. Continue Reading »

Is Tiger finished (III)?

I say “LAY OFF TIGER WOODS”! We’re not dealing here with a child molester or terrorist but the best golfer who ever lived.

He behaved abominably – of that there’s no doubt. He publicly humiliated his wife and he let us all down – badly. Let he who is without sin..….

Now, we’re told, there’s to be a documentary telling all about his evil father, Earl, and how he programmed Tiger and, indeed, had him hypnotized. If that vitiates Tiger’s accomplishments, what about others who have been encouraged indeed “forced” may not be too strong a word, to do what their father couldn’t? Martin Luther King Jr. comes to mind. So does Mickey Mantle whose father once gave him a licking for batting right against a right hander in a Little league game! He was named Mickey in honour of his father’s idol, Mickey Cochrane, the Hall of Famer with the Philadelphia Athletics and Detroit Tigers. Continue Reading »

A travelogue about London

Today. Please indulge me, a short travelogue.

When I had my show on CKNW I always did a travelogue and was always criticized by the station for doing so – which simply encouraged my view that it must be a good idea! I nearly always had positive feedback.

Last May, Wendy came to me as I was glued to my computer and said “you’ve aged 10 years since we were last in London in January so it’s time to go again”. I needed no persuasion and immediately went to work booking our usual room at the Kensington Hotel (formerly Jurys) and hitting the web for cheap airline tickets. This was quickly achieved so on September 2 we flew Air Transat (Thomas Cook) to Gatwick. The tickets were about $1000 each but we paid a couple of hundred extra for “Premium Class” on the way over hoping that the wider seats would help us sleep. They didn’t but that was mostly because we left so early that even a little pill didn’t help. Continue Reading »

Going through the motions.

Going through the motions.

When our MPs debate, there’s nothing really at stake. Why even pay attention?

When you read this, I will be in London trying to survive their coalition government, which, given a misstated word by the Deputy Minister Nick Clegg, means a minority government and democracy as we know it is doomed! Big Ben will no longer toll the time, rather a funereal, unending, muffled gong will remind the people of the perils ahead. Read full article at The Tyee: Canada’s Boring Pseudo-Democracy

There is something brewing in the environment – the disintegration of BC Hydro by this government – deliberately. This has been obvious to my partner Damien Gillis and me for 18 months. All signs point that way and the brilliant analysis by economist Erik Andersen which you can see at thecanadian.org lays it all out.

This is not rocket science, folks. Hydro is forced to pay for privately generated power at double its market value and the total bill is over $40 BILLION. This “buy high/sell low” policy can only have one result – bankruptcy. One tends to look at the immense dams and think of that as representing Hydro’s value but it doesn’t. The real value is in the water rights under the government’s control. The only way BC Hydro looks attractive – and it does do that! – is if the right to use the water, be it for power or use as a very sought after commodity, goes with the deal. The other obvious consequence is that Hydro rates will be set to get what the traffic will bear on the market or under contract – clearly, this means that rates to British Columbia industry and its citizens will skyrocket. Continue Reading »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »